* (1335)

Mr. Gary Doer (Leader of the Opposition): Madam Speaker, my question is to the First Minister (Mr. Filmon). In June of 1998, the Premier stated that a system dealing with the care of children needs to put the children's care and services first. This was dealing with the high unacceptable numbers of children in care under the responsibility of the Province of Manitoba through the Winnipeg Child and Family Services branch and the high numbers of kids in hotels.

I would like to ask the Premier: has the number of children staying in hotels under the guardianship of the provincial government, through the Child and Family Services branch of Winnipeg, been reduced consistent with the talk of the government last year, or has it gone up?

Hon. Bonnie Mitchelson (Minister of Family Services): Madam Speaker, I thank my honourable friend for the question. We have been working really aggressively with the Winnipeg Child and Family Services agency to try to ensure that hotels are not the first option for children. We have had some success in, at times–and I have to say at times, because it depends on the weather and the circumstances–the numbers decline or increase from time to time. I can indicate that the stays in hotels are considerably shorter.

When this issue was raised when the problems existed last year, children were staying in hotels for long, extended periods of time. There always will be need for short-term placement of children if they are being neglected, and there needs to be a safe place for those children. But we are moving aggressively, if hotels are the only option at that point in time, to ensure that children do not stay there for any prolonged period of time.

Mr. Doer: Madam Speaker, it sounded like a recorded announcement of last year.

I would like to ask the Premier (Mr. Filmon): why has the number of kids gone up in hotels, from 21 in April of 1998 to 28 in April of 1999, per day, a 33 percent increase, after the Premier promised to put the needs of kids first? Does the Premier not get listened to by his cabinet ministers? Can he explain why this increase has gone up, and what is he doing about it?

Mrs. Mitchelson: Madam Speaker, again, I will indicate that when children are in need of being protected because of abuse or neglect, we have to find a safe place to put them. I indicated in my first answer that a year ago there were children who were being lodged in hotels for extended periods of time, up to six months or a year, and that was unacceptable.

What is happening today is that children are still in hotels if there is no other option and they need to be protected, but it is not for extended periods of time. We are working aggressively with the Winnipeg Child and Family Services agency to ensure that the appropriate accommodation is found as quickly as possible.

Mr. Doer: Madam Speaker, maybe the safe places could have been foster parents in homes that this government, this Premier, this heartless Premier cut a number of years ago, his short-sighted kind of decision making full of rhetoric, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

Can the Premier explain why the Winnipeg Child and Family Services budget includes five children per night in hotels, and regrettably they are averaging 28 per evening? The cost is $231 per day per child, and they have gone over budget by $200,000 in April alone, $160,000 over budget. Surely we can find safer and warmer places for our kids than the Filmon hotel placements of Winnipeg Child and Family Services.

Hon. Gary Filmon (Premier): I recall that one of the first challenges that faced us when we took office in 1988 was the fact that our foster parents were the lowest paid in Canada. That was a legacy that was left for us by the New Democratic Party, and we significantly increased the funding to the foster parents because they were in dire straits as a result of the New Democratic priorities. That very significant increase put us into a position in which we were better off than we had been left by the New Democratic government, of which he was a part.

But I can say this, that one of the things that he too will recall is that while the New Democrats were in office, because there were so many significant cases of abuse and even death of children in care under the New Democrats, we had to have a review that became known as the Reid-Sigurdson Report to look into why things were going so badly under the New Democrats, in which the Leader of the Opposition was a cabinet minister, and of course the member for Wellington (Ms. Barrett) was a social worker in those days, part of the system.

Those are the things that we had to work with. Those were the things that had to be done under New Democrats. So, if he wants us to go back to the bad old ways that he is an example of, in which children were put at risk by the policies of the New Democrats, in which children were being injured and dying because of the policies of the New Democrats, I tell him the people of this province do not want us to go back to that.

* (1340)

Mr. Doug Martindale (Burrows): On May 18 of this year Winnipeg Child and Family Services said that placing them in hotels is too much like warehousing them, and it is the agency's responsibility to ensure that these children are receiving essential services. It was agreed it would be beneficial for the board to approach government now to try and advocate for resources to address this issue.

I would like to ask the Minister of Family Services: why is she waiting for the bureaucratic reorganization of the agency instead of putting the needs of children first and getting the number of children down who are in temporary placements which we know is up this year against last year? When is she going to put the needs of children ahead of the reorganization of the agency?

Hon. Bonnie Mitchelson (Minister of Family Services): I thank my honourable friend for that question, but I would like to remind him that we do not want to approach our Child and Family Services system like the New Democratic Party in British Columbia has. There are articles in the newspaper that talk about a New Democratic administration in British Columbia and how it is miserably failing the children in that province. The Child Advocate has written damning reports about the care of children there. So we do not want to look to British Columbia and the New Democratic Party for the solutions and the answers.

I have indicated very clearly that the difference between hotel placements for children this year is in fact a significant difference. The stays last year were long-term stays in hotel accommodation. If in fact children need to be protected, it is our responsibility to ensure that they are safe and secure and look at a long-range plan. We will continue to put the needs of children first.

Mr. Martindale: I would like to ask the Minister of Family Services when she is going to put the needs of children first, given that the number of days in care was 60,964 in April 1998 and has risen to 62,434 in April 1999. When is the minister going to do something, anything proactive to get the number of children in temporary care down and to have the number of children coming into care reduced? What announcements does she have, and why is she waiting for the reorganization when she promised that she was going to do something a year ago?

Madam Speaker: Order, please. The question has been put.

Mrs. Mitchelson: Madam Speaker, I wish I could indicate to all honourable friends in this Chamber and to all Manitobans that there was some quick-fix solution to children needing protection and support through the Child and Family Services system because there is not. And anyone who thinks there might be, like my honourable friend in the kind of question he asks, is burying their head in the sand.

The approach that we have taken as a government is to look at long-term solutions, long-term early intervention solutions that may not impact this year or next, but we know that children who are being born today are having programs put in place today so they will be more loved and nurtured and adapted, ready to go to school and to learn. We know those will have long-term impacts on children and families into the future. But if my honourable friend thinks he can promise a quick fix, I think Manitobans should be very wary.

Mr. Martindale: I would like to ask the Minister of Family Services how she can justify her department's failure to deal with warehousing children in Manitoba. Instead of talking about a quick fix, she said, a year ago: Just wait until the strategic planning process, and we will take care of that. We are not talking about a quick fix; we are talking about a year's time. The problem is getting worse. What is the minister doing?

Mrs. Mitchelson: Madam Speaker, I will indicate that there are no easy answers in the Child and Family Services system. I know that there are many that are committed to working to try to find the answers. We are going to have to try to ensure that when children do come into care, because they are being abused and neglected–and I do not think my honourable friend wants to blame me or our government for children being abused. We cannot accept that kind of responsibility as a government. What we have to do–

Some Honourable Members: Oh, oh.

* (1345)

Madam Speaker: Order, please. The honourable Minister of Family Services, to complete her response.

Mrs. Mitchelson: Thank you very much, Madam Speaker. As I was indicating, I think that parental responsibility is certainly the first and foremost issue that we need to look at and attempt to deal with, and that is exactly what we are doing by putting in place programs that work with young parents, with children, that provide early intervention and assessment of every baby at birth to see whether they are born to a family that may be at some risk and put those supports in place so we will not see the kinds of abuse and neglect into the future. All of those things will have a positive impact, and I indicated they are not going to fix things overnight. We have to continue to work at it.

Mr. Dave Chomiak (Kildonan): Madam Speaker, about a year and a half ago, the government made a decision to close down Levels 1 and 2 personal care homes, and as a result places like the Odd Fellows, which the previous minister now said was a mistake to close, closed down. The Victoria Park Lodge in Souris is an excellent facility, housing individuals, and the government, by its policy, is choosing to close down those Levels 1 and 2 care. I would like to ask the minister: in light of the terrible decision to close down places like the Odd Fellows, in light of the fact that we have difficulty placing people, will the minister commit today to keep Victoria Park Lodge open for the residents that exist there, providing the amenities and the facilities that they provide?

Hon. Eric Stefanson (Minister of Health): Madam Speaker, when it comes to the whole issue of personal care home beds in Manitoba, as the member for Kildonan knows, we have committed to the addition of some 850 new personal care home beds right across our province through not only this 1999 budget but previous capital budgets in the Department of Health. When it comes to the issue of personal care home beds in that region of our province, Hartney is acquiring new personal care home beds; Souris is getting an addition of personal care home beds, and I know the RHA in the community is working with that facility, Victoria Park Lodge, in terms of potentially providing something like supportive housing. We are seeing more and more supportive housing projects right across Manitoba, in Winnipeg and outside of Winnipeg, and again, that is meeting a specific need in many communities right across our province.

Mr. Chomiak: Can the minister explain how it is that admissions to Victoria Park Lodge, which had 20 beds occupied, now only has 12, have been closed by the government when there are people waiting in the hospital in Souris to get home care and cannot get home care, when there are people waiting for respite care and cannot get respite care? Again, it is an example of abysmal planning by the government.

Mr. Stefanson: Again, Madam Speaker, I do not accept any of the preamble on that second question from the member for Kildonan. When you look at waiting lists for personal care home beds in our province, they are down significantly right across the province. Here in Winnipeg alone, they are down to a level today of about 50, whereas if you go back a couple of years ago, they were up at 150 or 200. That again is because we are building more personal care home beds, we are opening more personal care home beds. To meet some of the immediate needs, we are putting in place interim personal care home beds, and we are dedicating significant resources for that very important service.

As I have said, to date, we are committed to 850 net new personal care home beds in the province of Manitoba. The actual number is well over a thousand that will be put in place because some beds are in fact being replaced in Manitoba. So, again, in that quadrant of the province, in that region of the province, there are new personal care home bed additions in Souris, in Hartney and in other regions of our province to meet the needs of people in our province for that service.

* (1350)

Mr. Chomiak: Madam Speaker, can the minister explain to me what he would say or what I should say to the 95-year-old resident of Victoria Park Lodge who I spoke to on Saturday or the 85-year-old resident who has lived there for years, who have recovered their health there, who are uncertain where they are going, who think this policy is wrong, who do not want to shift their home because of some grand government scheme? What would he say to those people who live there productively and now have to move because of their hard-headed policy that is wrong?

Mr. Stefanson: Madam Speaker, I remind the member, when we work on the capital projects across the province, we not only do it as a government, we work with communities and we work with the regional health authorities in terms of what are the priorities to meet the needs of those regions of our province. And again, I think that is an issue that members opposite have supported in the past, the concept of regionalization, the concept of that regional outlook for the services that are being provided, the opportunity for communities and individuals to have input into the capital plans. So the capital plan that we bring forward as a government is done with the input, with the consultation, with the prioritizing of the RHAs right across Manitoba when it comes to meeting our needs. That is why today we are building a net, new 850 personal care home beds right across the province of Manitoba. We are providing supportive housing in many areas of the province of Manitoba, all to meet the needs of our aging population.

Mr. Leonard Evans (Brandon East): Madam Speaker, I have a question for the Minister of Health. Between 9:30 and 10 a.m. last Friday, the Brandon general hospital had an air conditioning valve that broke, causing water to flood two offices on the fourth floor and then leaked into a wall in the ceiling of the emergency room. The place has since been cleaned up and the air conditioning system has been repaired.

My question to the minister is: will the minister admit that this deficiency in this old building could have caused a more serious problem, such as the collapse of the emergency room ceiling and resulted in certain injuries and other dire consequences as a result of the neglect by this government of the Brandon general hospital for the past 11 years?

Hon. Eric Stefanson (Minister of Health): Again, I do not agree with the preamble from the member for Brandon East. He comes asking a hypothetical question–wondering what his objective is by asking that kind of a hypothetical question. He knows the commitment that this government has made to the Brandon Regional Health Centre on a number of fronts, many millions of dollars dedicated to the whole redesign, reconfiguration of that very important facility, not only to Brandon but to that entire region of the province of Manitoba. Obviously, the health authority in Brandon was able to take action to deal with that particular need, and that is exactly what they should be doing. But, again, we made commitments on a number of projects. I have reminded the member for Brandon East of those projects. I am certainly prepared to pull them out again and remind him of all of the commitments we have made to health care in Brandon and that community, and particularly to the Brandon Regional Health Centre.

Mr. L. Evans: Well, Madam Speaker, will the minister acknowledge that we can have additional serious problems because of the age of the building, and that renovations and needed repairs were put off by the administration because that administration had been promised a new building over a decade ago? It has been put off and put off. They have put the repairs aside, and now this is what we are getting: serious problems.

Mr. Stefanson: I agree with no such thing. Again, when we have buildings right across our province, on occasion buildings are going to have some maintenance issues that have to be dealt with. Brandon has done just that. The RHA dealt with that issue, and they put the repairs in place. I remind the member for Brandon East that, just in the last few years alone, there is $65 million in capital commitments to the city of Brandon and their health care facilities, most significantly the Brandon Regional Health Centre that has a commitment of approximately $40 million for a major capital project, a major redevelopment for that facility.

Those are commitments that this government is making. Those are commitments for putting the money in place to provide those very important services for the people of Brandon and the surrounding area. I would hope that the member for Brandon East would support that kind of commitment from our government.

* (1355)

Mr. L. Evans: Madam Speaker, three or four years ago, the honourable former Minister of Health had a beautiful model of a building, and we were promised it then, and you are still promising. That is all we have had is promises. Nothing but promises, wilting promises.

Madam Speaker: Order, please. The honourable member for Brandon East was recognized for a final supplementary question.

Mr. L. Evans: Will the minister acknowledge and recognize that the Brandon general hospital has experienced a rash of structural problems? This is not the first. We have had elevators that have not been working, there have been leaky windows, and many other problems.

Madam Speaker, my question to the minister is: will this minister put up additional dollars right now for badly needed repairs so the place will not fall apart while we are waiting for a new building?

Mr. Stefanson: Madam Speaker, I assure the member for Brandon East that the Brandon Regional Health Centre is in good hands, and will continue to be in a good state of repair. I remind the member for Brandon East just some examples of what has happened at the Brandon Regional Health Centre: $4.4 million completed for a new 25-bed adult acute psychiatric unit; $3.2 million completed for the Western Child and Adolescent Treatment Centre; $135,000 for roof repairs; $665,000 for a hemodialysis unit, completed in August of '96; the scheduled opening of the energy centre, $14.7 million to open in October of this year; currently, $38 million in design for the Brandon Regional Health Centre. That is just a sample of the significant capital commitments that our government has made to the Brandon Regional Health Centre, to the city of Brandon and the people of that part of our province.

Mr. Kevin Lamoureux (Inkster): Madam Speaker, my question is for the Premier. The garment industry over the years has gone through a chronic shortage of skilled workforce. In fact, it is highlighted to the extent that we have a prominent businessman who is suggesting that he might have to have production now moved over, at least in part, to Mexico. These are jobs that are in fact potentially being lost, and I would argue we have lost jobs because of our inability to get the skilled workforce necessary to fill them.

My question to the Premier is: what is the Premier prepared to do to ensure that those jobs within the garment industry are in fact going to be filled so that we are not going to permanently lose more and more jobs?

Hon. Gary Filmon (Premier): I thank my honourable friend for the question. He may know that the individual that he has referenced, Mr. Silver, is chairman of our Economic Innovation and Technology Council for the provincial government, and we have had numerous discussions with him in ensuring that we were working towards just precisely the solution of that problem. As he may well know, the growth of the fashion industry in our province over the last couple of decades has been largely fuelled by having skilled immigrants come and take the jobs. Mr. Silver has been a great advocate of our initiatives to urge the federal government to open up immigration for skilled people who could fill many of the skill shortages that have been listed in stories very recently, even over the last few days in the front pages of our newspapers.

The reality is that the federal government is setting immigration policy. He knows full well because he fought, I know, his own federal Liberal government against the head tax. He fought them for setting quotas on immigration and limiting the immigrants to our country because the policy is set based on the strong feelings of people in Vancouver and Toronto and not for the needs of a province like Manitoba who can use more skilled immigrants. I urge him to join with us to perhaps even propose a joint resolution in this House to urge Ottawa to open up immigration in our province so that we can get more skilled workers to fill the needs of a burgeoning, growing economy.

* (1400)

Mr. Lamoureux: Is the Premier prepared then to reconvene a committee which we had established a few years back to deal with the garment worker shortage in order to try to work with Ottawa in resolving this very serious problem?

Mr. Filmon: The member probably knows that the shortages are not just in the area of the garment industry or the fashion industry. Indeed, the list of skilled people that was contained in, I guess, a front page article today says accountants, composite technicians, computer-controlled machine tool operators, computer programmers, computer systems analysts, early childhood educators, daycare managers, electrical technicians and technologists, electrical and electronics engineers, heavy equipment managers, hog barn managers, machinists, mechanical engineers, sheet metal workers, tool and die makers, welders.

Really, the tremendous opportunities that are here in this province because of our growing, burgeoning economy require us, I believe, to have a program that opens up our doors to many more immigrants. We need the co-operation, the support and the commitment of the federal Liberal government, and he as a Liberal in this Legislature I think is well positioned to be a bridge between the views of those in this Legislature. I believe that members opposite would join us, members of the New Democratic Party, in a joint resolution to urge Ottawa to change its perspective on this particular issue.

I say to him having a committee reconstructed is not the best answer if we do not have Ottawa's attention, and I would urge him to join with us in getting Ottawa's attention on this matter.

Mr. Kevin Lamoureux (Inkster): On a different issue, I ask the Minister of Education: will the minister give us equal access to what I have been told the NDP likely have from their friends in Seven Oaks, access to the report so that all members of this Chamber know what is the content of that report?

Hon. James McCrae (Minister of Education and Training): Madam Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition (Mr. Doer) has not been clear with us as to whether he has been briefed on that report or whether he has actually seen a copy of the report prepared by the Seven Oaks School Division. It would be nice if the Leader of the Opposition would be a little bit more open with this House and with the people of Manitoba about what he knows about what is in that report, such as it is.

I am not very happy with the report, to say the least, because, in order to release it, the honourable Leader of the Opposition calls for its release, I suspect, knowing full well that there are aspects of this report that tend towards defamation of people's characters and requires that it be very carefully gone over by Freedom of Information people so that we can release something, but unfortunately, in an incomplete form. But again, the Leader of the Opposition has not shared with anyone how much about that report he knows.

Hon. Mike Radcliffe (Minister of Labour): Madam Speaker, I would like to respond to questions that were raised by the member for Brandon East (Mr. L. Evans) with regard to the Simplot experience in Brandon recently which were taken as notice.

I am prepared today to advise this Chamber that Workplace Safety and Health and Mechanical Engineering branches have jointly conducted and completed their investigation and are in the process of finalizing a report on this incident. I can confirm that repairs and modifications to the processing equipment have been completed and inspected by Mechanical Engineering branch inspectors and, bottom line, the plant is back in operation.

The department has verified that the desulfurizer feed preheater involved in the incident is safe for use, all safety controls have been tested and proven in the presence of our inspector, and five new gas shutoff valves have been installed, one for each of the burners. I am told that we have had two mechanical engineers, one chemist and a Ph.D. in metallurgical engineering, plus a number of hygienists, all of whom have been involved in the research and renovations, and the mechanical engineering boiler inspector has also inspected the areas for the repair work.

Mr. Leonard Evans (Brandon East): Madam Speaker, on a very serious point of order.

The minister responsible for Workplace Safety and Health is giving us vital information affecting the safety of a community of 40,000 people, and the Minister of Environment (Mrs. McIntosh) keeps on nattering from her seat. I simply cannot hear the answer, which is very important.

I would ask you to call this member to order, and ask her to give us a little decorum in this place.

Madam Speaker: The honourable government House leader, on the same point of order.

Hon. Darren Praznik (Government House Leader): Madam Speaker, on the same point of order. Day after day after day, we hear members opposite making comments from their seats, not putting accurate information forward on the record, and a host of things that invite response.

I would suggest that you advise all honourable members about the need to ensure that members can hear what is going on in the Assembly.

Madam Speaker: Order, please. On the point of order raised by the honourable member for Brandon East, I am not convinced it was only the honourable Minister of Environment who was causing a disruption. However, I would agree that he did have a legitimate point of order. It was extremely noisy, and I, personally, was experiencing difficulty hearing the honourable Minister of Labour's response. I would ask for the co-operation of all honourable members.

Mr. Radcliffe: Thank you very much, Madam Speaker. Although a number of members of the Chamber have urged me to start again, I would conclude my response by saying that there has been intensive and far-reaching investigation. There have been significant repairs effected to the plant. The plant is back in operation. I want to assure members opposite that there is in fact no danger at all to either the workers at the Simplot plant at this present time, nor the residents of Brandon East, or for that matter Brandon West.

Ms. Rosann Wowchuk (Swan River): Madam Speaker, farmers have been facing serious problems because of the weather over the last while. However, they are facing far more serious long-term problems because of high input costs and increased transportation costs. The study by the Canadian Wheat Board and Canadian Shipowners Association confirms what we have been saying for some time now. That is, farmers are paying far too much in freight costs. In fact, they are paying $224 million annually in costs that they should not be paying.

I would like to ask this government how they can support the implementation of the Estey report without a full costing review that farmers, municipal people and other leaders have been asking for to ensure that the money goes where it should be going, and that is into the farmers' pockets. [interjection]

Hon. Darren Praznik (Minister of Highways and Transportation): Madam Speaker, I know the member for Roblin-Russell and I are very close on many issues, but this is certainly one as well.

Madam Speaker, as the lead minister on the Estey report, what I find absolutely incredible in the question from the member for Swan River is that here is every provincial government in western Canada, two Conservative and two New Democratic Party governments, struggling to find a way to ensure that we get competition into the grain transportation industry so we can see dollars go back into the pockets of farmers, and members opposite, by way of a resolution to this Assembly, said we should keep the status quo. All the status quo has done has seen the efficiencies go into the hands of the railways.

Madam Speaker, the No. 1 prerequisite of all our prairie governments to be involved in the Estey report was that whatever savings and efficiencies can be found have to go back into the hands of the producers.

* (1410)

Ms. Wowchuk: I would like to ask this minister: is his government going to continue participating in the implementation of the Estey report, given that railways are backing away from their offer to cut the total bill of moving grain, and that railways are reluctant to allow open access, something that farmers and all other groups have been asking for? Are you going to continue to participate in that process?

Mr. Praznik: Madam Speaker, let us remember the Estey report is a federal initiative because most of these issues, if not all, are in federal jurisdiction. What members opposite have said is we should bury our head in the sand and walk away and not be involved in the process to try to steer it in a manner that is most advantageous to Manitoba producers. That is a total abrogation of responsibility. Yet they come to the House now saying: well, we are concerned. Just a few weeks ago in this Chamber, they said we should not be involved.

Madam Speaker, things like open access, things like ensuring that savings find their way into the hands of producers are the reason why we are at the table to fight for those, rather than run away like New Democrats opposite.

Ms. Wowchuk: We will see how well this government does in getting money into farmers' pockets, Madam Speaker.

Madam Speaker, given that the savings the railways have realized are because of rail line abandonment and shifting costs to farmers, why is this government not insistent that these savings be passed on to farmers, such as the productive gain sharings which Estey did not recommend, insistence that no more lines be abandoned in this province? Why is this government not insistent that some of those things happen to ensure that money gets into the farmers' pockets?

Mr. Praznik: Madam Speaker, for the third time, I tell the member that all three prairie provinces, two Conservative and one New Democrat, have all taken that same position. We have all been at the table, continuing to advance that position in what is a federal process. But let us remember the advice that the New Democratic Party, led by the member for Concordia (Mr. Doer), gave to this government in a debate in the House a few weeks ago: Walk away from Estey. They brought a resolution to this House saying we should not be involved in the process. Well, how do you influence a federal process if you are not at the table? They propose running away. We propose standing there to fight for farmers in Manitoba.

Mr. Gerard Jennissen (Flin Flon): Madam Speaker, my questions are for the Minister of Energy and Mines. As the minister knows, the 10-year-old limestone weir that is supposed to contain the copper tailings from the old mine site at Sherridon is collapsing. Is the minister prepared to put in place remedial work on the weir before tailings contaminate Kississing Lake, harm the drinking water and potentially injure the growing tourism industry at Sherridon?

Hon. David Newman (Minister of Energy and Mines): Madam Speaker, we discussed this issue at some length during the Estimates process, and I indicated the status report on this particular issue. I am aware that Warren Preece from Global and the honourable member were up in Sherridon viewing it together, and I saw a bit on television since then. The assurances continue. This matter is under study, and a solution for this very serious issue is under consideration. It is something that is a high priority for implementation.

Mr. Jennissen: Given the fact that there is approximately $18 million in the Mining Reserve Fund, and given the fact that the 1996 culvert diversion project at Sherridon which cost approximately half a million dollars did not stop tailings from leeching into Kississing Lake, will the minister reconsider his time lines and fast-track phase two of the Sherridon pollution control project?

Mr. Newman: When the recommendations come in from the people who have been engaged to provide the report, this will be treated as a very serious, important matter that deserves expeditious treatment. There are all kinds of competing priorities in government when we come to these kinds of issues, and this is a very high priority issue, so he should stay tuned to the progress that is being made as we move forward with a report.

Madam Speaker: Time for Oral Questions has expired.