LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF MANITOBA

Tuesday, March 22, 2022


The House met at 10 a.m.

Madam Speaker: O Eternal and Almighty God, from Whom all power and wisdom come, we are assembled here before Thee to frame such laws as may tend to the welfare and prosperity of our province. Grant, O merciful God, we pray Thee, that we may desire only that which is in accordance with Thy will, that we may seek it with wisdom and know it with certainty and accomplish it perfectly for the glory and honour of Thy name and for the welfare of all our people. Amen.

      We acknowl­edge we are gathered on Treaty 1 territory and that Manitoba is located on the treaty territories and ancestral lands of the Anishinaabeg, Anishininewuk, Dakota Oyate, Denesuline and Nehethowuk nations. We acknowl­edge Manitoba is located on the Homeland of the Red River Métis. We acknowl­edge northern Manitoba includes lands that were and are the ancestral lands of the Inuit. We respect the spirit and intent of treaties and treaty making and remain committed to working in part­ner­ship with First Nations, Inuit and Métis people in the spirit of truth, recon­ciliation and col­lab­o­ration.

      Please be seated. Good morning, everybody.

ORDERS OF THE DAY

PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS

Hon. Doyle Piwniuk (Acting Gov­ern­ment House Leader): Yes, Madam Speaker, I want to suggest that we debate 205–Bill 205.

Debate on Second Readings–Public Bills

Bill 205–The Filipino Heritage Month Act

Madam Speaker: It has been announced that the House will continue with debate on second reading of Bill 205, The Filipino Heritage Month Act, standing in the name of the hon­our­able member for Concordia, who has three minutes remaining.

An Honourable Member: Picking up speed.

Mr. Matt Wiebe (Concordia): Yes, I'm letting the House catch up here, and I ap­pre­ciate the warm welcome here this morning because this is an im­por­tant bill, and it is an im­por­tant bill to be debating here this morning.

      I just wanted to start at the outset, Madam Speaker, to say that, you know, we are in full support of this bill. And this is an im­por­tant bill to our caucus because it really speaks to the kind of part­ner­ships that we're looking for with com­mu­nities through­out Manitoba.

      You know, we talked–I think in–last week, if I'm remembering some of the debate that I heard in the Chamber, there was a lot of talk about the support that new­comers here in Manitoba and different com­mu­nities have for one another.

      And I know first and and foremost, on many people's minds these days is actually the conflict in Ukraine just because, of course, how serious and pressing it is.

      But to see how others are stepping up to support people who are looking to come to Canada to join in our province and to be here as a safe place, I think, speaks to every–the importance that every single com­mu­nity sees in presenting a welcoming place here in Manitoba.

      This, I believe, is one way that we can do that. It's not the only way.

      And so, it's–while it's im­por­tant to remind the gov­ern­ment that words are words and actions are actions, that they need to step up and they need to ensure that their words have some actions behind them, that it's not just enough to say that we support com­mu­nities, that we support new­comers here to Manitoba, but, in fact, that we put in place real policy that supports and helps to encourage them to flourish.

      I think that's the main message that we want to send to all Manitobans.

      So, you know, we–as I said–we support this bill and it is some­thing that we want to see come to a vote because we know how im­por­tant it is, and when all of us get a chance to gather in person, I am so hopeful, Madam Speaker, that we can all join together in person to celebrate Philippine in­de­pen­dence this summer. And we can do it as–together as a Legislature with this kind of bill and this kind of message coming from this Legislature to the Filipino com­mu­nity to say how much we ap­pre­ciate your con­tri­bu­tions to Manitoba, how we want to work with you to further those con­tri­bu­tions, how we want to continue to work together.

      We see all people in this province as the keys to building a prosperous Manitoba coming out of this pandemic. When we get to gather together in celebration, I know that it's going to be a wonderful time.

      So thank you very much, Madam Speaker, for the op­por­tun­ity to speak, and look forward to seeing this bill come to a vote.

Mrs. Cathy Cox (Kildonan-River East): I'm honoured and proud to rise in the House today in support of Bill 205, The Filipino Heritage Month Act, that legislates June as Filipino heritage month in Manitoba.

      And I'd like to thank my friend and colleague, the member from Brandon East, for intro­ducing this very im­por­tant legis­lation that will ensure Manitobans will in perpetuity have the op­por­tun­ity to celebrate and recog­nize our vibrant Filipino culture and heritage.

      Our Filipino com­mu­nity is such an im­por­tant part of our ethnic and cultural fabric. Their con­tri­bu­tions to our province are immense not only economically but also socially. And I can say with con­fi­dence, from the bottom of my heart and from my own personal experiences, that the Filipino com­mu­nity is caring, com­pas­sion­ate, hard-working and generous. And they wear their hearts on their sleeves, Madam Speaker, and are always willing to step up to help those in need.

      Madam Speaker, while I was the chairperson of the Children's Hospital Foundation bazaar at the Winnipeg taxation centre, I had the op­por­tun­ity to observe the generous nature of our Filipino com­mu­nity first-hand. There was always so much to do to reach our goal, and it was always the Filipino employees that were first to step up, asking how can they help. They made thousands and thousands of spring rolls, and prepared pancit for sale. They sold tickets, and they were a huge part of ensuring we reached our goal of helping sick kids here in Manitoba.

      I have such fond and remark­able memories of the Filipino nurses, the health-care aides and the workers–provided my mom with such loving and com­pas­sion­ate care during her time at Concordia Hospital. They brought joy and laughter into what was often a very dreary time in her life.

      Madam Speaker, since the start of the pandemic, Filipinos have been on the front lines in hospitals and personal-care homes, working and challenging settings where they toiled tirelessly not only as caregivers but also filling in as re­place­ments for family and friends.

      And I want to say from the bottom of my heart to our Filipino com­mu­nity, for the hope, the compassion and the dedi­cation and the care that they have provided to Manitobans during these three turbulent years, thank you very much.

      Madam Speaker, today, I also reflect on the presence of three Filipino members of the Marcelino family who served in this Chamber: my former CRA colleague, Ted Marcelino; the former leader of the op­posi­tion, Flor Marcelino; and her daughter, the current member who represents the constituency of Notre Dame.

* (10:10)

      And I ask the member from Notre Dame to encourage her colleagues in the NDP caucus to stand together with us and support this bill.

      Our Filipino com­mu­nity has done so much to build and help our province prosper. I ask all members to stand together in solidarity and show our Filipino com­mu­nity the respect they so deserve, by voting unanimously in favour of this bill.

      Thank you, Madam Speaker.

Mr. Mintu Sandhu (The Maples): It is my honour to put a few words on the record regarding bill 204, the Filipino heritage act month act. I'd like to thank the member from Brandon East for bringing forward this very im­por­tant bill. I am in support of this bill, and my caucus is in support of this bill.

      Madam Speaker, Filipinos are hard-working, caring, family-oriented people. I just want to high­light a couple of the people that I have worked with. First one is Vickey. She is aunt of MLA from Waverley. She is working with Unicity Taxi since 1976. I was only four years old at that time. I just spoke to her this morning. After retiring from Unicity she is still–whenever called back to help or to train the new person, she is back there this morning training a new person.

      And also, another person that I worked with at Unicity Taxi is Tess. She was our accountant. She worked with us for 46 years. This is the dedi­cation they put into work. This is how hard they work.

      Madam Speaker, this bill proclaims the month of June each year as Filipino heritage month, which would coincide with the Filipino–Philippines In­de­pen­dence Day. Philippines In­de­pen­dence Day takes place every year on June–12th June.

      While in-person celebrations were cancelled or scaled back for a couple of years, we are hopeful that this year, 2022, we will be able to celebrate this day of in­de­pen­dence with the Filipino com­mu­nity once again. We look forward to seeing parades or partici­pating in programs, spend their day in the parks with family and friends, do other celebration activities and enjoy the day with the Filipino com­mu­nity.

      Filipinos are now recog­nized as Winnipeg's largest ethnic minority, making up almost 9 per cent of the city's total popu­la­tion. Madam Speaker, here in The Maples, we have 31.4 per cent of the popu­la­tion of the Filipino heritage. And Tagalog is Manitoba's most spoken–second most spoken, and Canada's fifth most spoken language.

      I have the honour of working with a hard-working lady named Beth, who is my CA. She's skilled both in English and Filipino language. Beth was able to reach out to the thousands of our constituents and learn their concerns, whether personal or family or general concern in our com­mu­nity about what is happening in our province.

      Another CA I'd like to high­light, Madam Speaker, is Sanjit Sidhu, otherwise–likewise, could com­mu­nicate in Filipino or Tagalog dialect, even though Punjabi is her native language.

      In The Maples con­stit­uency, we are able to reach out to the masses of visible minorities.

      Madam Speaker, I'd also like to high­light a few of the politicians that were elected under NDP banners. Conrad Santos was first elected to Manitoba Legis­lative Assembly under our party in 1981, and there is no doubt that Dr. Santos paved the way for many Filipino politicians in Manitoba and also in Canada.

      Madam Speaker, another person I'd like to high­light is Ted Marcelino. He is another prominent Filipino Manitoban that was elected to the Manitoba Legis­lative Assembly in 2011 repre­sen­ting the Tyndall Park.

      Madam Speaker, I think not too many members know, that was the first time I ever tried to run for a–office. I was contesting the nomination in the Tyndall Park and that's the time–first time I ever met Ted there. Well, they had a tent outside and I said, Ted, well, I was–this is me, Mintu. And Ted said, you know what, let's eat food first, then we will talk.

      So, even during the recent election, 2019, our office, myself, Ted and the member from Burrows had the same office. So, Madam Speaker, each and every day when we go there, first thing is food, then Ted will take us one by one and talk to us. You know what, we were nervous, we were new. He wanted to make sure we are calm and going out, talking to people, so he was telling us, do this, do that. Same thing at end of the shift, pretty much you can call the shift at end of the day. We will go back and Ted will call us again, let's chat; let's eat some­thing and let's chat.

      So that's how wonderful Ted Marcelino is. To this day, whenever I need some­ kind of advice, he is there for me.

      And also, Madam Speaker, another NDP person that I–who got elected under the NDP banner is Flor Marcelino for the first Filipina and woman of colour to be elected in the Manitoba Legis­lative Assembly in 2007. She also served as interim leader of NDP and leader of official op­posi­tion from 2016-2017. Her ap­point­ment to the Cabinet in 2009 was also another first.

      So, Madam Speaker, as I said earlier, we on this side of the House are in full support of this bill. This is the kind of bill when I will come to the floor, be sure to be talking, be sure to be high­lighting our con­stit­uents, be sure to be high­lighting our friends.

      So there was no denying that we are in support of this bill, but also high­lighting it. My side of the House, each and every member had some­thing to say about someone in the com­mu­nity. In this side of the House, all 17 members want to get up, give their 10 minutes. We have so, so much to share.

      But this, Madam Speaker, as I said, I'm–fully support of this bill, members of our caucus is in fully of support of the bill. Looking forward to be unani­mous–passing this with unanimous consent and enjoying, come June, cultural activities, language activities and joining the parade, hopefully, this year.

      Thank you, Madam Speaker.

* (10:20)

Mr. Josh Guenter (Borderland): I'll be very brief, so as not to delay the passage of this bill. It sounds like the members opposite are willing to finally help us get this bill through this morning, and so I just wanted to be very brief and say I think this is a wonderful op­por­tun­ity to recog­nize Manitoba's Filipino com­mu­nity, making June Filipino heritage month.

      I think of the experiences that I've had interacting with members of the Filipino com­mu­nity. My time as a student at Uni­ver­sity of Ottawa, I attended a church in Ottawa at which these wonderful Filipino ladies took pity on me and kept me fed and they were just wonderful people to get to know.

      But it seems that happiness, hard work, are national traits from which I think we as Canadians could learn a lot. They contribute in so many ways to our prov­incial fabric and our national fabric. And so, Madam Speaker, I think this is a great way to recog­nize all that they do and contribute.

      I'm proud to say as the member for Borderland that there is a small but growing Filipino com­mu­nity in Altona, and, actually, they've started a Filipino restaurant there, Potpourri of Flavours, which I highly recom­mend for anyone ever down that way,

      But, Madam Speaker, without any further ado, I urge the passage of this bill this morning. Thank you.

Mr. Ian Bushie (Keewatinook): Thank you, Madam Speaker, for the op­por­tun­ity to share a few words on The Filipino Heritage Month Act.

      And before I begin, I would absolutely like to say that we are in full support of this bill, and I'm privileged to be able to share a few words before passage here this morning.

      First and foremost, I guess before I begin, I do want to point out, being that we are sitting here in the Chamber, privileged enough to be able to serve the people of Manitoba in our role as an MLA, that I would like to make mention of the notable Filipino Manitobans that served, in parti­cular, for the New Demo­cratic Party.

      Conrad Santos was first elected to Manitoba Legislature under our party in 1981, and there is no doubt that Dr. Santos paved the way for Filipino politicians here in Manitoba.

      Ted Marcelino is another prominent Filipino Manitoban that was elected to Manitoba Legislature in 2011, repre­sen­ting Tyndall Park.

      And, of course, the NDP's Flor Marcelino was also a prominent member of the Filipino com­mu­nity, and was the first woman of colour to be elected to the Manitoba Legislature Assembly in 2007. She also served as interim leader of the NDP and leader of the op­posi­tion from 2016 to 2017. Her ap­point­ment to Cabinet in 2009 was also another first. She was the first woman of colour to be named to Cabinet in the province.

      And, of course, my colleague–my current col­league, the MLA for Notre Dame, who speaks very eloquently, very passionately, for the Filipino com­munity here in Manitoba as well as all com­mu­nities here in Manitoba.

      Madam Speaker, while this act and this bill brought–Bill 205 brought before us this morning shows ap­pre­cia­tion, it's meant to do so much more. It's meant to do so much more than just–when you think about ap­pre­cia­tion, you think it's just a simple thank you. To me, this bill needs to be about ap­pre­cia­tion, recog­nition, respect–overall, not just once a month, not just one month out of the year, but always.

      The Filipino com­mu­nity here in Manitoba has been so very embedded in society now and our demo­gra­phics here in Manitoba, and it's such a positive impact and a positive influence, and you see that first and foremost, I guess, Madam Speaker, in the health-care field.

      Nurses, health-care aides–and when I think of the term a great bedside manner, I can't help but relate that comment of great bedside manner to the 'Filocupino' com­mu­nity–nurses, the health-care aides and the doctors that are there that bring that–while you're in the hospital, most times, you're there and it's not a positive ex­per­ience in terms of your medical con­di­tions while you may be there, so you're looking for supports.

      And it's–I mean, there's supports in terms of actual medical care, but there's also supports in terms of emotional care and being able to make that stay a little bit easier. And members of the Filipino com­mu­nity thrive at that, and it's a great ex­per­ience to be able to go to the hospital, for whatever reason you may have to go, and feel that there's somebody there that cares.

      And members of the Filipino com­mu­nity in parti­cular are–in this instance, in the health-care field, make that ex­per­ience a lot easier to cope with and easier to handle. And for that, that's–there's a great deal of ap­pre­cia­tion that's owed.

So if we can do some­thing as small as this–and, albeit, we need to do a lot more in terms of actual recog­nition to say, you know, we want to spend this month to celebrate. But we need to spend those–the year to celebrate. And that's what's im­por­tant, Mrs.–Madam Speaker, because being in that health-care field, and in parti­cular over these last couple of years, was very difficult, and the Filipino com­mu­nity was very dis­propor­tion­ately affected by COVID‑19.

So that com­mu­nity, while they're always there to support us as Manitobans, we also need to be there to support them, and that's where it's very im­por­tant that we do things such as this, but also do more. And I think it's very imperative of us as Manitobans–and our duty as Manitobans–to do more, to do you part and then some. And I think that's what makes us a better Manitoban–a better Manitoba overall.

      And, Madam Speaker, there's a lot of different aspects–and, I mean, we focus maybe on health care, and the health-care field in terms of the Filipino impact and the positive impact on our com­mu­nities. But there's so much more: doctors, lawyers, pro­fes­sionals, farmers–all aspects. And it speaks to the very true diversity of what we are here in Manitoba and we need to celebrate that diversity. And here we are today being able to bring forth Bill 205, The Filipino Heritage Month Act, to be able to do that in a small way, but as I said, we need to do more.

      There's a lot of–and this is more than just in the city of Winnipeg, in our bigger, urban areas–this also gets out to rural Manitoba and to northern Manitoba. And myself, being an MLA from northern Manitoba–well, north-central Manitoba–I'm seeing more and more of that impact, that positive impact about the Filipino com­mu­nity expanding outside of our urban areas, expanding outside of just the city centres and it's a fantastic ex­per­ience to have.

      I remember my ex­per­ience years and years ago. And from where I am, it's Highway 304, you know, up to the–kind of, the northeast side of the province. And there's a place where the Manigotagan River crosses the Highway 304, and time and time again, I'd always come by there–and it's a great fishing spot–there's a falls right there and every­thing–and time and time again, so many times there's been a large number of Filipino families that come there to fish.

      And I've stopped in there and we've shared stories–you know, where are you from, where do you live, what do you do?–those kind of things. And it's always been–and for the most part, Madam Speaker, there's been a lot of them that said, you know what, oh, I'm a health-care aide. I'm a nurse. My family does this, my family that. But we just kind of–it brings to me the knowledge of just being able to become a Manitoban and being able to celebrate that–and just sharing those stories.

      You know, it wasn't the matter of, you know, I'm Indigenous, I'm First Nation, you're Filipino, you're Manitoban, those kind of things. It was just, we're all Manitobans and we're all here together and we're all in one kind of group that we all relate. And it was just a matter of being able to go over the talk of fishing.

      And I'm sure members on this side of the Chamber, members opposite, have had those experi­ences also. And that's the great way, and that's the fantastic thing about the province of Manitoba is being able to celebrate those achieve­ments, being able to celebrate those storied–and, in parti­cular, today, being able to celebrate those achieve­ments, those stories and those accom­plish­ments with the Filipino com­mu­nity of Manitoba.

      So if there's the smallest way that we can show our ap­pre­cia­tion by passing an act such as this, then I'm grateful. I'm honoured to be able to stand up and say a few words about that. But I also want to be very cognizant about the fact that we could always do more, and I think that's some­thing that we need to be very, very adamant about, be very proactive about is let's do more. Let's do more to show our appreciation for the Filipino com­mu­nity here in Manitoba, and the con­tri­bu­tions that those com­mu­nity members make not only to just a–certain fields, whether it be pro­fes­sionals, doctors, lawyers, health-care aides, those kind of things, but just overall.

      Let's celebrate our students that are up-and-coming, you know, whether they be elementary students, junior high, high school, post-secondary–let's celebrate those students today, too, of Filipino heritage. Let's be able to say, you're our future.

      One of the phrases that I've used so commonly, Madam Speaker, is our youth is not only our future, but they're also our now. So let's do that. Let's celebrate our Filipino youth now also. Because there's some point in time, Madam Speaker, where none of us will be sitting in this Chamber anymore, and we need those youth to be able to do that.

* (10:30)

      And I'm sure my colleague, the member from Notre Dame, when she shares a few words, and very, very passionate about her history, her back­ground, her family. She's very passionate and very proud to be able to say the com­mu­nity she comes from, her back­ground, her heritage.

      So when this bill was brought forward, it was just, wow, here we go. Here's some­thing we can agree on. Here's some­thing we can push forward. Here's some­thing we can actually do and realize that it was long overdue.

      And, I mean, there's been gov­ern­ments for many, many years now that have not done some­thing like this. And, I mean, that is some­thing that–we can work across all lines; we can work across the aisle; we can say this is some­thing we need to support.

      But again, Madam Speaker, it's about doing that and then some. So what can we do to support more? What can we do to enhance this, to make this show of ap­pre­cia­tion more than just a piece of paper that says we recog­nize this one month out of the year?

      Let's show appreciation for our Filipino com­mu­nity always. Not just today, not just tomorrow, but always.

      So, Madam Speaker, in being able to stand up here and speak in support of this bill, and I know this is some­thing that's very passionate on–from this side of the Chamber also, to be able to say we're in full support of this bill, and it is some­thing that was long overdue, but let's do more.

      Madam Speaker, with those few words, I'd like to say miigwech. Thank you very much.

Ms. Nahanni Fontaine (St. Johns): I'm going–I'm pleased to get up and put a couple of words on the record in respect to Bill 205, The Filipino Heritage Month Act.

      I think that it's pretty evident that everyone in the House supports Bill 205. I think it's an im­por­tant bill to recog­nize Manitoba Filipino citizens who have done so much in the com­mu­nity.

      I just want to concentrate on a little bit of the con­tri­bu­tion of the Filipino com­mu­nity here in Manitoba to our great, amazing province. I'm going to start by acknowl­edging some of the Filipino folks who sat in this Chamber, or who have been involved in politics.

      And, certainly, I think it's im­por­tant to start with Flor Marcelino, who was the first BIPOC woman to ever be elected in this Chamber, and that's quite a historic moment, not only for Flor, the former MLA, not only for her family, but certainly for all Filipino citizens here in Manitoba, but, more parti­cularly, Filipino women.

      So, you know, that moment when Flor was elected in this Chamber represented a moment that Filipino women could see them­selves reflected in this space, a space that–as I have often said in this Chamber–was not meant for women, and certainly was not meant for BIPOC women.

      And so I have an enormous amount of respect for that courageous step that Flor Marcelino took when she was approached to run for the NDP. And that commitment that she had in being a really good MLA. Flor was a really good, committed, dedi­cated MLA.

      And, you know, it's not easy when you're in these spaces because you do still have to contend with and navigate what is, again, a space that historically–and still I would suggest contemporarily–the domain of men.

      And, you know, I find it–you know, Flor had to put up with a lot of stuff in this Chamber, parti­cularly when she was the acting interim leader for the NDP. I remember some of the things that the members across the way would shout at Flor.

      So I do want to give Flor the recog­nition and the acknowledgment and the respect that she is owed and deserves in this Chamber as we sit and debate Bill 205.

      Again, I also want to recog­nize Ted Marcelino, who also sat in this Chamber on this side of the House, who was a beloved member of our caucus–who folks may not know, always brought us treats, fried banana treats, I think they're called. I don't–and he was–I know when I first got elected he was somebody that you could go and just talk to if you needed to feel like you had family. If you were feeling kind of insecure on this new role, he was always there.

      And, you know, I want to acknowl­edge our colleague, the MLA for Notre Dame. You know, Flor becoming the first BIPOC woman in this Chamber, in the same way as, you know the member for The Pas (Ms. Lathlin) and the member for Point Douglas (Mrs. Smith) and the member for Union Station (MLA Asagwara), those historic moments are trans­formative in com­mu­nities; they're transformative in the lives of BIPOC citizens.

      And so, you know, we are very blessed to be able to work and–with the MLA for Notre Dame and to call the member for Notre Dame (MLA Marcelino) our colleague and our sister. We're so blessed to work with her. And, you know, for those folks that don't have much interaction with the MLA for Notre Dame or don't know her very well, she is so dedi­cated to this role and dedi­cated to her job and dedi­cated to her com­mu­nity and her con­stit­uency and dedi­cated to all Manitobans. And, you know, it's quite amazing when you, you know, you watch or you witness what the MLA for Notre Dame is accomplishing in her com­mu­nity and in her con­stit­uency.

      And, you know, it's so im­por­tant to have a woman, a Filipino woman like the MLA for Notre Dame in this space, because, again, the Filipino com­mu­nity see them­selves reflected in her and in her work. But, more im­por­tantly, Filipino women see them­selves reflected in her and in her work. And so I lift up my colleague from–the MLA for Notre Dame, I lift her up today and I say miigwech for all of the work that she does and she continues to do.

      Why is it im­por­tant to be reflected in this space? Why is it im­por­tant that not only do we celebrate a–Filipino citizens here in Manitoba, but it's im­por­tant that we have them reflected in here because, again, it is transformative.

      And so, you know, we know that, pre­domi­nantly, Filipino women played such a huge role in our health-care system in the midst of a global pandemic. I don't think anyone can say enough about the role that Filipino women played during the pandemic in the health-care system–and are still playing that role in home care, as nurses, as, you know, health-care allied pro­fes­sionals, all of these things that Filipino citizens play, pre­domi­nantly citizens–Filipino citizens–Filipino women citizens play in the health-care system is so im­por­tant.

      So, you know, we support Bill 205. We support our colleagues past and present in this Chamber. But it's not enough just for the gov­ern­ment to have a bill that is a recog­nition day. That's not enough. It's not enough to not pay people for their labour. It's not enough for this gov­ern­ment to sit here and, on the one hand, express support and recog­nition for Filipino citizens here in Manitoba but, on the other, say that they don't deserve a raise or they don't deserve COVID hazard pay or they don't deserve, you know, when we have home-care workers that are driving from home to home or appointment to ap­point­ment and not getting the dollars that they are entitled to while they're driving. It's not enough.

      So, you know, we've seen so many times from this PC gov­ern­ment, both, you know, under the leadership of, you know, of the former premier, Brian Pallister, and under the current leadership of the new Premier (Mrs. Stefanson), that they talk outside both of their–on each side of their mouth. On the one hand, we support them, we recog­nize them, but on the other hand, we actually want to do the bare, bare minimum to ensuring that Manitoba Filipino citizens are entitled to equity within Manitoba.

* (10:40)

      They are doing the bare minimum, like they do on every single other file that they have. The environ­ment, the economy, whatever it is, they do the bare minimum. They think that Bill 205 is–that's it, that's great, this is all we need to do to show that we're committed to the Filipino com­mu­nity in Manitoba.

      It is a start. And Filipino Manitobans deserve this. They deserve this, one hundred per cent. But they also deserve fair wages; they also deserve safety at work; they also deserve to be represented here in this Chamber. [interjection] And they deserve to be equitable in the policies that these ones who can't even–who are chirping right now–can't even listen to the last 20 seconds of my speech. They deserve to have that equity and that respect from members opposite.

      So we support Bill 205. To that end, I would suggest that the PC caucus of Manitoba actually put more commit­ment into equity for Manitoba Filipino citizens.

      Miigwech.

Mr. Mark Wasyliw (Fort Garry): I'd like to just put a few brief comments on the record in relation to this act.

      Obviously, I'm very proud to stand in support of this bill and stand in support of the Filipino com­mu­nity here in Manitoba. They have obviously become a integral part of modern Manitoba and have basically an oversized influence and importance in our economy and our politics and our cultural fabric, and that's going to continue to grow. And I think that's a great thing for Manitoba, and this com­mu­nity certainly deserves this honour and this respect.

      Being a member of an ethnic minority, and knowing that on the Order Paper a similar bill is coming in relation to the Ukrainian com­mu­nity, I do have to pause and put a few comments about these types of performative politics that we're seeing more and more of by this gov­ern­ment.

      It appears that as time wears on–and this tired gov­ern­ment is, you know, failing even more–their approach to governing Manitoba is to sort of hide and to put forward these sort of symbolic acts in place of real governing, in place of real action, real policies that can actually make lives better.

      And it's troubling for a couple reasons. I mean, I'm a member of a very large ethnic minority, one that's a large voting block, as is the Filipino com­mu­nity. So we get to have these performative politics type acts brought before here.

      I'm thinking about all the other ethnic minorities in Manitoba that are integral and contribute, but they're small, so they don't get recog­nition days, they don't get recog­nition months and they don't get the attention of the gov­ern­ment. And that's very telling, because their con­tri­bu­tions are no less worthy or im­por­tant, and it just sort of smacks of this sort of empty, cynical politics, this sort of micro-targeting that we're so used to with the Stefanson gov­ern­ment.

      And, you know, as much as it's nice to be recog­nized and seen by the Province for your community's con­tri­bu­tion, that recog­nition without more is empty. It's hollow and ultimately can be very disrespectful.

      And we're seeing that play out right now with the crisis in Ukraine, with the Russian invasion in Ukraine, where, you know, this gov­ern­ment tells the Ukrainian com­mu­nity here in Manitoba that we're ap­pre­ciated and respected but that they won't spend any money on our issues, that they won't help in our time of need or our time of crisis.

      And, you know, you can have all the acts in the world. When the com­mu­nity's voice never actually gets into this building, doesn't actually reach the gov­ern­ment and the gov­ern­ment isn't actually prepared to recog­nize the com­mu­nity's concerns and needs and act upon them, then, ultimately, these can be very empty and, ultimately, can be even hurtful to the com­mu­nities that–whose name they are put forward in.

      So I would encourage the gov­ern­ment that, you know, this is great, we need to do that, we need to show respect to the Filipino com­mu­nity. But you just can't stop there–and I know that's their plan. I know that's where they want to stop. I know that's as far as they want to go with these things. But they don't want to actually address, and have never addressed the real issues affecting the Filipino com­mu­nity, just like they will not addressed and will not act on the real issues affecting the Ukrainian com­mu­nity, and I could go down the list.

      And this gov­ern­ment just wants to wrap them­selves in whatever com­mu­nity flag without doing the hard work to get to know us, to know what our needs are and to reflect those needs in gov­ern­ment policy.

      And so, hopefully, this gov­ern­ment will be better this time, that they will not only just pass this act, but they will bring in necessary reforms when it comes to our immigration process here in Manitoba. They'll bring in necessary reforms with how we deal with service workers and how we respect them, how we pay them and whether we bring in a living wage. Because at the end of the day, you know, it's great to be Ukrainian or whatever, but if you can't pay your bills then that's some­thing else.

      And so, I certainly urge this gov­ern­ment to drop the performative politics–I mean, it's trans­par­ent, everybody can see it, it's gross–and actually come back and start properly listening to Manitoba's com­mu­nities and bring in the policies and the help that they're asking so desperately from this gov­ern­ment.

      So with those few brief words, I'm going to sit down because I'm very interested in hearing what my colleague has to say.

      Thank you.

MLA Malaya Marcelino (Notre Dame): Madam Speaker–sorry, can you hear me?

Madam Speaker: Yes, we can.

MLA Marcelino: Thank you.

      As a Manitoban legislator born in the Philippines and very much immersed in the Filipino culture, it is my humble honour today to rise, virtually, to speak to this very, very valuable bill that will mark June as Philippine heritage month.

      Madam Speaker, every month growing up in my house was Filipino heritage month. My parents, from the very begin­ning, they tried to impart their love of country and its people to myself and to my siblings.

      My own name, Malaya, Madam Speaker, it means to free; it's a verb. My brother's name is Diwa; it means soul or your conscious, the thing inside you that makes you human. I have another brother named Mayon. Mayon in Bikolano, another language of the Philippines, means beauty and it refers to a volcano in the Philippines with a very perfect cone. I have a sister named Awit, and her name is translated to the Psalms, like in the bible, or songs. And then I have a sister named Lualhati, and her name means glory, glory like when you're doing a prayer, when you praise God, glory to God.

      And then even our dog, Madam Speaker, growing up, had a Filipino name. His name was Gilas, and it meant brave.

      So as a parent myself, now, you know, we've continued this tradition. And I have two sons, my husband and I, and my son's name is Sandigan, and that means a strong foundation, and I have another son, Damayan, and it means working together towards a common goal.

      So, you know, growing up we were immersed in current events from the Philippines. My mother, Flor, had a newspaper called the Philippine Times and she was the publisher and editor of that. And as a high school student, I partici­pated by writing articles for this newspaper. I interviewed, I remember, com­mu­nity leaders such as CKJS radio host Joe Capalad Sulit and another com­mu­nity leader, Perla Javate, who has too many accolades and too many years of service for me to do justice here. I even got to interview and write about a future president of the Philippines, Gloria Arroyo, back when she was only a con­gress­man–congressperson.

* (10:50)

      So, growing up in our household, we were also exposed to the many needs of the com­mu­nity, especially for Filipino migrant workers.

      Madam Speaker, what was imparted to us at an early age was that language is the carrier of culture. I remember, over 30 years ago, my father, along with some members of the Manitoba Association of Filipino Teachers–they started a language program–heritage program called Wika for young children.

      And I was too old at 10 years old to partici­pate in that, and so I was in charge of preparing snacks for the little ones.

      I would like to briefly lift up the con­tri­bu­tions of  MAFTI, again, the Manitoba Association of Filipino Teachers, under the current leadership of Genalyn Tan, for their more than 40 years of service bringing language instruction to children, youth and adults. And just a very wonderful group of volunteers there, volunteer teachers here. I've had the pleasure first-hand of seeing the calibre of 'instructure'–instruction that these teachers can provide. I, myself, take part in Filipino heritage language classes and will continue to do so.

      I just want to use this op­por­tun­ity to thank my last semester's teacher, Victoria Cabrera for her patience, and the other volunteer teachers who partici­pated in my class.

      Madam Speaker, there are other very very many im­por­tant Filipino organi­zations that promote Filipino culture. For example, the Philippine Heritage Council of Manitoba, under the leadership of Perla Javate–they are respon­si­ble for Philippine heritage ball every year, and with the pandemic, they shifted to online discussions about culture and com­mu­nity.

      Another very im­por­tant Filipino organi­zation that promotes culture is ANAK. They target youth and young people to kind of talk a little bit more about history and identity. They have workshops yearly and even provide–and have provided lectures at the Uni­ver­sity of Winnipeg. They also provide youth mentorships, which is really im­por­tant.

      My younger brother Mayon partici­pated in that, in the youth mentorships.

      The Knights of Rizal is another very im­por­tant organi­zation that I'd like to high­light. They've been around for decades. They teach com­mu­nity members about a national hero, Jose Rizal, and their con­tri­bu­tions to literature and to the Philippine revolution.

      And there are more recent cultural organi­zations as well such as Kultivation and street festival and so many more that I hope to discuss in the future and to recog­nize these other organi­zations at a different stage of debate for this bill.

      Madam Speaker, I'm very proud to stand with this NDP caucus. You know, full support of this heritage bill–this is a NDP caucus that has put forward very im­por­tant bills on heritage recently such as The Emancipation Day Act and Somali heritage act.

      And myself tried to put forward a reso­lu­tion commemorating 500 years of Filipino history in celebrating the con­tri­bu­tions of Filipino Manitobans last year, in 2021, but, unfor­tunately, the PCs killed that reso­lu­tion and it didn't pass.

      I'd like to thank the member of St. James for this words during this debate about issues plaguing the Filipino com­mu­nity, on com­mu­nity safety and justice.

      I'd like to thank the member for Wolseley (Ms. Naylor) for her con­tri­bu­tions to this debate, speaking about the Filipino queer com­mu­nity and their con­tri­bu­tions to Manitoba.

      I'd like to thank the member for Union Station (MLA Asagwara) who con­tri­bu­ted to this debate by speaking about our Filipino health-care workers, the importance of paid sick days to our many Filipino front-line and essential workers and the need to be compensated properly.

      I'd like to thank the MLA for Transcona who's con­tri­bu­ted to this debate by discussing the minimum wage and affordability and the issues that many Filipino essential workers and front-line workers and new­comers face and the hardships that they face because of, you know, only being on minimum wage.

      And I'd like to also thank the member for St. Vital (Mr. Moses) who spoke very knowledgeably on the issues of the barriers to accreditation that many Filipino new­comers and immigrants continue to face and the repercussions of that to family members.

      So, you know, there's been some discussion that we are–that the NDP is stalling this debate, and nothing could be further from the truth, Madam Speaker, because it is our in­ten­tion to support this Philippine heritage month bill, but it's also our in­ten­tion to possibly strengthen this through further amend­ments down the line, and it is definitely our in­ten­tion to always be able to represent the needs of the Filipino com­mu­nity in any kind of chance that we get, because that's why we are elected, and that's why we're here: to bring forward the needs of our com­mu­nity and to represent them in this space, here.

      And I will never be ashamed for doing that because there is no–at no time have I ever received a phone call from a Filipino com­mu­nity member asking me, you know, can I please have a June heritage month? I've been asked by Filipino com­mu­nity members, you know, my son has been murdered. What can we do to help me? What can we do? And then the families will say to me, what can we do to make our com­mu­nities safer?

      I've been asked by a–by Filipino com­mu­nity members, you know, I would like to be able to take my years of ex­per­ience and my years of edu­ca­tion and be able to work here in this country. How can you help me to do that? Those are the kinds of concerns that Filipino com­mu­nity members are asking me for.

      And so we are taking this op­por­tun­ity to discuss that, here in this House, and to be able to bring forth this bill to its next stage.

      And, Madam Speaker, I actually have some ideas to make this bill even stronger that I would like to bring forth during an amend­ment stage, so–as our Premier (Mrs. Stefanson) always says–stay tuned for that.

      And with that, I'd like to conclude my remarks. This is a very, very im­por­tant bill. Heritage and–

Madam Speaker: The member's time has expired.

      Are there any further members wishing to speak on debate?

      If not, is the House ready for the question?

Some Honourable Members: Question.

Madam Speaker: The question before the House is second reading of Bill 205, The Filipino Heritage Month Act.

      Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

Hon. Wayne Ewasko (Acting Gov­ern­ment House Leader): I'd like to see if it's the will of the House to see that the vote was unanimous?

Madam Speaker: Let the House show–is there will of the House to show that the vote was unanimous? [Agreed]

Mr. Ewasko: We'll see if it's the will of the House to see that the clock is 11 o'clock, and proceed to private members' reso­lu­tions.

Madam Speaker: Is it the will of the House to call it 11 o'clock? [Agreed]

Resolutions

Res. 7–Recog­nizing a Suc­cess­ful Agri­cul­ture Safety Week

Madam Speaker: The hour is now 11 a.m. and time for private members' reso­lu­tions. The reso­lu­tion before us this morning is the reso­lu­tion on Recog­nizing a Suc­cess­ful Agri­cul­ture Safety Week, brought forward by the hon­our­able member for Dauphin.

Mr. Brad Michaleski (Dauphin): I move, seconded by the MLA for Portage La Prairie,

WHEREAS March 14, 2022 until March 20, 2022 was Canadian Agricultural Safety Week in Manitoba; and

WHEREAS during this time students and workers participated in learning activities which aimed to reduce the amount of agriculture-related accidents; and

WHEREAS agriculture work places are unique in the aspect that many of these work places are where families work and live; and

WHEREAS agriculture is one of the most dangerous industries in Canada, but Agriculture Safety week is working with farmers to reduce the amount of accidents; and

WHEREAS agriculture projects must take into account the safety of the task at hand, whether that is the safety of workers, customers, or the environment; and

WHEREAS producer groups, non-profits, government bodies, industry and researchers formed what is now the Canadian Agricultural Safety Association in 1993 to respond to issues of health and safety in agriculture; and

WHEREAS the Canadian Agriculture Safety Association works with partners in government, business, and farming organizations across the country to support initiatives that equip producers, their families and their workers with the information and tools needed to make farms a safe place to live, work and play; and

WHEREAS this event each year allows agriculture workers to gather and discuss the emerging safety needs that are unfolding in Canadian Agriculture.

      THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Legis­lative Assembly of Manitoba expresses its gratitude to the people of Manitoba and agri­cul­tural producers for their role in making this year's agri­cul­ture safety week a success.

Motion presented.

* (11:00)

Mr. Michaleski: Thank you again, Madam Speaker, for the op­por­tun­ity to get up and speak on Recog­nizing a Suc­cess­ful Agri­cul­ture Safety Week here in Manitoba. I know our gov­ern­ment is very ap­pre­cia­tive of the agri­cul­ture producers in our province, and, of course agri­cul­ture, is a major backbone in our province and it really affects almost everybody in the province.

Mr. Andrew Micklefield, Deputy Speaker, in the Chair

      So, there's unique circum­stances in the agri­cul­tural industry that are–that again, quite unique, they change all the time and the working con­di­tions, the working environments are ever changing.

      Again, you know that if you're living on a farm or you have employees, there is an extra level of importance, when it comes to safety, and without a doubt, over the years, safety is becoming a–has become a large part of operations on the farm as farms grow and as we have more employees coming dif­ferent times of year.

      Again, this is changing–an ever-changing en­viron­­ment, so safety is really a culture and a top-of-mind issue, so recog­nizing agri­cul­ture safety week is im­por­tant, because we do need reminding. And this one week gives us an op­por­tun­ity to talk about it and discuss those things at a farm level or as a com­mu­nity level.

      And we do need reminding, and I know I can speak for myself, you know, just keep drilling it in and what it takes every now and then is some­thing to happen and you stop and you think about what you're doing, and, you know, that's an earned–or a learned response, sometimes, to just stop and think.

      So, I do ap­pre­ciate the work that's being done in terms of safety–farm safety across the sector–and it's helpful that there's people that are working to promote safety week and, of course, also doing it on a non-stop basis.

      Again, if we're–again, very dynamic industry, lots of sectors, lots of people involved, and I would say it's changed over the years from–there's a lot more people that are involved outside the farm as support, that are getting involved in production, and I think–you know, and if we look to the future, you know, those–it's just seeing the fears of merging markets and changes in the marketplace are just requiring a lot more people to be involved in this, and when we do that, to be successful with any sort of strategy like that or emerging op­por­tun­ity, health and safety is absolutely key.

      And I know, just speaking in my own operation, when we have people that are coming in, they're not familiar with operations, they're not familiar with how equip­ment operates. Again, and that's not their fault, it's just a reality, so safety just becomes a bigger and bigger part of a suc­cess­ful strategy.

      So, again–and I know as a farmer and also as a–someone that's worked in manufacturing for quite a few years, but I'll use farming as example, there's lots of times when there's people that come down, and whether it's after work or weekend warriors that come out and help, and they want to have fun on the farm, and we encourage that, but you know, you've got again–you've got a really moving picture, when especially at the spring and harvest seasons, and then you throw people in there as well.

      And it can be chaotic and fun, but it is, again, a combination between family, and then you've got young kids that are learning and they're jumping into the whole operation, and again, there's a lot of people around, so safety, I know for us it just gets really heightened up at those times of year. And whether it's in the field or down the road or moving equip­ment around or, you know, we could have, you know, people–local cattle producers. They could be moving cattle down the road exactly the same time as we're, you know, as we're moving a drill out into the field. So lots of issues of safety. That's why I say it–safety is a culture on most of the farms and people are really working to adopt safety practice, a lot of people helping.

      Of course, equip­ment and tech­no­lo­gy has come a long way–built-in safety to improve. And I think that's really part of the good news, because based on the data from Workers Compensation Board the rate of injury in the ag industry has decreased since–of course, since our gov­ern­ment was elected, but is a combined effort that is helping that along.

      And–but, again, we have a mix of people that are coming to the farm. This is an area of risk and area of safety. And as an employer, we are respon­si­ble for knowing and applying the principles and laws intended to ensure the safety and health of all people working on the farm. So from my ex­per­ience, from what I've seen, again, agri­cul­ture is–really has adapted and embraced safety and, of course, there's lots of pro­gram­ming that's there to help, whether they do it on their own or they do it–there is organi­zations that will help, you know, larger organi­zation, more employees with help to get safety plans in place.

      And–but the one thing that a lot of farmers–individual farms now–is the use of PPE. That's come a long way. I know, for me, I know it was a little bit late when they came to ear pro­tec­tion and those things. But now we've got ear plugs. We've got safety glasses. I used to go to the optometrist and he'd used to give me the gears because how come all these welding sparks are on my glasses? And I, well, you know, the safety glasses were across the shop, so I couldn't get it. So I used to get the gears over that.

      So now we've got safety wear for your eyes and your ears and, of course, masks–you know, go back a lot of years, ate a lot of dust. But we've got a lot of equip­ment that's–you're able to sort of work around that and protect you in all the senses, like touching–again, gloves and pro­tec­tive gear when you're working around hazardous chemicals or other different environments. You know, there's pro­tec­tions that are out there and they are readily being adapted.

      Last one, probably, is, again, with brain and mental health is some­thing, again, people are a little more aware of that. You know, in the past it was pretty–it's been and it will continue to be times of intense pressure, whether it's financial or whether it's weather-related. You know, fatigue weighs in. There's a lot of the things that are going through the–a producer's head at the time. And, again, you add in harvest time and plus a bunch of new recruits, it can be quite a thing.

      So safety is absolutely im­por­tant, and I do know safety from my ex­per­ience has been high on the radar for lots of producers and lots of organi­zations–and, again, I support them. We need them. They're there to remind us and to keep reminding us, and that's not a bad thing.

      So some of those, like keystone agri­cul­ture pro­ducers, Manitoba Farm Safety, they provide training, farm safety con­sul­ta­tions, barn inspections. Again, there's people out there that can help producers, or operations or busi­nesses, craft and look and evaluate their premises, their operations in terms of safety. You know, there's lots of organi­zations–Canadian agri­cul­ture safety association is another one.

Again, training is available to people like never before, and I know farmers are–you know, they may only have one or two employees, but they're using that. And Mr. Deputy Speaker, it's im­por­tant. Agri­cul­ture safety is im­por­tant and we do, again, need to be reminded, need to be constantly working on agri­cul­ture safety week.

      So I want to recog­nize everyone who's helped so much during last week's Canadian agri­cul­ture safety week.

* (11:10)

      We all want to make it home in one piece, Mr. Deputy Speaker, and there's lots of people that are helping in that regard.

      Thank you.

Questions

Mr. Deputy Speaker: A question period of up to 10 minutes will be held, and questions may be addressed in the following sequence: the first question may be asked by a member from another party, any subsequent questions must follow a rotation between parties, each in­de­pen­dent member may ask one question. And no question or answer shall exceed 45 seconds.

      The floor is open for questions.

Mr. Diljeet Brar (Burrows): I ap­pre­ciate the member from Dauphin for this reso­lu­tion because farm safety is im­por­tant for all of us, especially for those who work at the farms.

      Just wanted to ask the minister: What is the PC gov­ern­ment doing to support farmers and help them recover from the record-setting drought last year?

Mr. Brad Michaleski (Dauphin): I thank the member for the question.

      I know our gov­ern­ment has really stepped up this year in terms of agri­cul­ture support during a pretty extra­ordin­ary drought situation in 2021. It was a large drought affecting a large part of North America, and I know we were there to–probably one of the bigger things I thought was, you know, changing the crop insurance program to the alter­na­tive use. That was a much-needed action that was taken to, you know–crops were deteriorating and there was some value, salvage value for feed, so I know that those two programs for–

Mr. Deputy Speaker: The member's time has expired.

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): I note in the member's reso­lu­tion the comment is that agri­cul­ture is one of the most dangerous industries in Canada.

      I ask the member for Dauphin whether–what the per cent of farms are who have a farm safety plan, and can the member tell us the difference between, I mean, the time safe–work loss to injury actually only applies to farm workers, not to owners or family members, is that correct?

Mr. Michaleski: I thank that member for the question.

      It's the issue of farm safety plans. Again, in my ex­per­ience, in our–in my area, there isn't a lot but it's–it is a culture, without a doubt, where the producers and the farmers are–it's sort of like the environ­mental farm plans; they are adopting safety practices, safety invest­ments. They're investing in time, training their staff. Again, it's nothing formal in terms of a plan, but I think when the–when you get into larger operations requiring more people there would be formal plans–

Mr. Deputy Speaker: The member's time has expired.

Mr. Blaine Pedersen (Midland): I certainly thank the member for Dauphin for bringing forward this reso­lu­tion.

      And as an active farmer, can he outline some of the safety concerns that stand out to him, both on his farm and within the farming com­mu­nity?

Mr. Michaleski: I thank the member for the question.

      And sure, there's a number of issues. I think a long-standing one has been hydro lines. When you're walking in or driving into people's yards, you notice that.

      That's, you know, because we've had to trans­form our own farms, you know, to ac­com­modate those, so you look for those things because you're just sort of–you get caught a few times and rip a few lines down, you stop doing that and you start watching that. So, that's happened to me.

      So that's one thing I do watch, and I look at around for the traffic, the mobility in the yards–

Mr. Deputy Speaker: The hon­our­able member's time has expired.

Mr. Brar: When we talk about safety, we talk about safety of the workers, safety of the farmers and also safety of the busi­ness of–our farmers are running.

      Just wanted to ask the member from Dauphin, in the event of a flood that impacts Manitoba producers, what supports is the gov­ern­ment prepared to offer if hit by another difficult production year?

Mr. Michaleski: To answer the member's question, I don't have a crystal ball on what's in place in the event of a flood. There is–you know, there–that's a–that's very much a–some­thing that is not permanently in place that I know of.

      But I know when it came to the–look at the drought. Now, gov­ern­ment–our gov­ern­ment was there to help those producers during a time of need when there was feed shortages, when there was water issues. Our gov­ern­ment was around this summer, like we always are, taking agri­cul­ture very, very seriously. And we were there–

Mr. Deputy Speaker: The member's time has expired.

Mr. Ralph Eichler (Lakeside): Thank the member from Dauphin for bringing this reso­lu­tion forward. And I know, being a farmer himself, you've seen changes in safety.

      And what are some of those things that you've seen that help farmers in Manitoba?

Mr. Michaleski: Thank the member for the question.

      There has for sure been a lot of im­prove­ments over the years, I know in all-use equip­ment in parti­cular. I know there's–you know, equip­ment of the past, you could hot-wire them, you could get them sort of moving and started, and right now there's a lot of safety features that are built into equip­ment to prevent you from some accidents that could happen.

      You know, it's–once you get out of the operator's seat, a lot of it shuts the machines down, shuts PTOs down, and–so you're not dealing with moving parts. That's probably–

Mr. Deputy Speaker: The member's time has expired.

Mr. Brar: Would the member mind sharing what they are hearing from the Crown land ranchers in the Dauphin con­stit­uency?

Mr. Michaleski: I want to thank the member for the question, and just remind him, you know, Manitoba cattle producers are the best, they are an in­cred­ible asset for Manitoba.

      They don't want subsidies, like the member is–may suggest. They don't want subsidies, they want strong markets. They want com­pre­hen­sive, stable markets with market access and they want to compete.

      We're there to support them in this and make sure that they're–the markets are developed and they're protected. And our gov­ern­ment is there to protect them and help them grow their sector for them and for the whole economy of Manitoba.

Mr. Ian Wishart (Portage la Prairie): I'd like to thank the member for bringing this forward.

      I wonder if he would like to outline some of the differences that make safety on the farm different from safety in other workplaces?

Mr. Michaleski: I want to thank the member for that question.

      It–and I think I mentioned, too, a bit in my opening comments on this, but you really do have a live one when you're talking about agri­cul­ture operations, operating environments. It's changing all the time so you need to be safety conscious at all times.

      And I can tell you, in–you know, in minutes or instants things can change, the whole picture can change, you know, whether it's people coming in or a breakdown or some­thing happens, it's not an assembly line situation. It's a very, very–

Mr. Deputy Speaker: The hon­our­able member's time has expired.

Mr. Brar: Very respectfully, I would offer another op­por­tun­ity to the member from Dauphin to share with all of us if he is hearing anything from the Crown land ranchers in his con­stit­uency: phone calls, emails, letters.

      If yes, what they're saying?

* (11:20)

Mr. Michaleski: Again, I want to remind the member again, you know, Manitoba beef producers up in our area, they produce some of the world's best–world's best–beef, and I know our gov­ern­ment takes that sector very, very serious. We listened to them. [interjection]

Mr. Deputy Speaker: Order.

Mr. Michaleski: –and they asked for changes to Crown lands. They know there's emerging op­por­tun­ities. We need to align the sector for growth in the future. The producers do not want subsidies. In spite of what–[interjection]

Mr. Deputy Speaker: Order.

Mr. Michaleski: –the member says, Manitoba producers want open marketplace. They want access. They've got a great product and we need to do every­thing we can to help them get it into the marketplace.

Mr. Deputy Speaker: The time for questions has expired.

Debate

Mr. Deputy Speaker: The floor is open for debate.

Mr. Diljeet Brar (Burrows): Today, the member from Dauphin offered us the op­por­tun­ity to talk about our hard-working producers in Manitoba and those who work at the farms.

      We call it farming. We call it agri­cul­ture. Farm safety is im­por­tant, we all know, and we express our gratitude to the farmers, to the farm workers. It's im­por­tant that we make sure the safety of everyone who works at the farms–not just at the farms, in any work setting.

So this reso­lu­tion is a good one that recognizes a suc­cess­ful agri­cul­ture safety week, which was last week. And the member decided to bring in this reso­lu­tion, spend some time to work on the draft and give us an op­por­tun­ity to put a few words on the record regarding the safety at the farms, safety in agri­cul­ture settings, safety where ever people related to agriculture, ag professions work. So that's some­thing good.

      But what I see is that this member finds an easier way to talk about agri­cul­ture. We ap­pre­ciate–we ap­pre­ciate–our farmers. We ap­pre­ciate our farm workers. Everyone does ap­pre­ciate because they feed us. We should be thankful to them for putting food on our table. But that's not some­thing that's enough for the farmers. We need to do a lot more for our farmers, because we know that our farmers play an im­por­tant role in our economy. They have built Manitoba. They have built Canada. They have played a critical role in our history, as well, not just in the economy. So we celebrate. We proudly say that Manitoba is a province that produces food not just for Manitobans, not just for Canadians, but for the outer world, as well.

      So we know that this gov­ern­ment has got not a very great record when it comes to the farming com­mu­nity. This government failed to stand with our producers when they needed them most. May it be drought, may it be flood, may it be COVID‑19, they failed to stand with them.

      This gov­ern­ment needs to move beyond just ap­pre­cia­ting the farming com­mu­nity. They, rather, need to do some­thing concrete that the farmers ap­pre­ciate, and I have talked to so many farmers after being elected and being given this respon­si­bility as critic for Agri­cul­ture, the farmers do not ap­pre­ciate what this gov­ern­ment is doing for them.

      This gov­ern­ment is not standing strong with our producers. This gov­ern­ment and its repre­sen­tatives, elected MLAs and ministers–they're not showing up at the gatherings of farmers where they want to discuss about drought.

      I am a witness of such situations in 2021 when the farmers invited MPs, MLAs, op­posi­tion critics and ministers and their repre­sen­tatives, especially in Interlake. I didn't see a single PC repre­sen­tative standing with those farmers, listen to them about what they are going through during that drought period.

      And, to my surprise, there was no regret message sent to that occasion where more than 100 farmers were actually waiting for a PC repre­sen­tative to listen to them, to offer some­thing to them, to work together for them to get out of that situation or handle that tough situation.

      We know that our farmers are doing a great job to serve the land, to maintain the land, to produce food for us in a sus­tain­able manner. But those farmers need support from the current gov­ern­ment so that they can have some load off their minds, because they are suffering from that. They are suffering from weather and other hardships. They are suffering from supply chain disruptions.

      So that's when the gov­ern­ment needs to show leadership to support those farmers, but, unfor­tunately, this gov­ern­ment did not.

      I, again, ap­pre­ciate the member from Dauphin, who fails to answer my questions regarding Crown lands, to offer us an op­por­tun­ity at least to talk about agri­cul­ture and issues our farmers are facing. I simply asked if the member from Dauphin is hearing from the Crown land ranchers around Dauphin area. In fact, the Crown land ranchers are requesting this member to listen to them, to support them, to talk to the Agri­cul­ture Minister, and this gov­ern­ment is not responding positively to sit together and meet with those producers.

      I got a chance to talk to them. So what they shared is–for example, I talked to one of the Crown land ranchers and the gentleman shared with me that five or six of his neighbours–they got out of busi­ness. He took up a pen and paper and started mapping the farms around his ranch: this guy left, that guy left, this guy left. So he is explaining how practically the Crown land changes that this gov­ern­ment brought in 2019 is impacting their lives.

      Practically, what happens when a producer needs, for example, help on culling, help on vaccinating their animals or help on repairing machinery? They used to just walk to next door and ask for help. Now there is no next door. They have to drive 30 minutes to ask for help. That's practical impact of these Crown land changes.

      And those people are suffering with the rent which has been increased 300 times. Can anybody in this Chamber tell me an example of any busi­ness during COVID who got their rent 300 per cent up?

* (11:30)

      And these producers share their pains with me, that we are those unfor­tunate people who feed you all and this gov­ern­ment raised our rent 300 per cent. What that means is that this gov­ern­ment is purposely, in­ten­tionally kicking them out of busi­ness.

      When a gov­ern­ment just thinks about money, they start auctioning these pieces of land to people with deeper pockets. What's the impact? The impact is that the young farmers who want to start their life, want to start a career in agri­cul­ture, in farming, they're not able to because they're not–they don't have that much wealth. They don't have that much money to bid the rich people out.

      So this gov­ern­ment is just caring for the rich, not the ranchers, not the family farms who have been feeding us for gen­era­tions.

      So while I ap­pre­ciate this member for bringing in this reso­lu­tion–which is im­por­tant because it talks about agri­cul­ture safety week and agri­cul­ture safety–I also remind this member and the PC gov­ern­ment to listen to Crown land ranchers, to do some­thing to save our family farms. Because we need to bring in the next gen­era­tion and we need to see our towns and–

Mr. Deputy Speaker: The member's time has expired.

Mr. Blaine Pedersen (Midland): I certainly thank the member for Dauphin (Mr. Michaleski) for bringing forward this reso­lu­tion on farm safety, and as we celebrated farm safety week the third week of March, just remind–it's a reminder to all of us that every day is safety day on the farm.

      And farming is–has a rather unique–is a rather unique occupation because there's so many different jobs involved on a daily basis. It's not standing in one parti­cular job or doing one parti­cular job during the day, and so the safety skills are certainly many and varied.

      However, there have been a lot of advances made in farm safety, and although we recog­nize that there are still much more to do and there has–you know, there continues to be incidents on–in terms of farm safety. I'm certainly–I certainly have my share of incidents on the farm over the years. But I was always managed to survive them and that was–but I know of many others who have had some really seriously debilitating accidents and even some deaths, and that's always sad when you hear about that and certainly when they were–could have been preventable too.

      In terms of im­prove­ments, there's–machinery has improved a lot. The noise levels, a few of us can attest to noisy cabs on tractors from years ago, and we're probably paying the price for that. And when you look at the lighting on equip­ment, they have to go down our highways and–to–in order to travel from field to field, and certainly the lights on them–the warning lights–are much better. There still needs to be an awareness from the public that this is slow-moving equip­ment and sometimes very wide equip­ment that takes up a lot of the road. You know, there's been in advances in that.

      Guards and shields are much more robust and on equipment now as compared to older equip­ment and–but they need–those guards and shields need to be remaining in place in order for safety not only for the farm, farm families, the farm owners, but also for employees, and this is where a lot of training comes into place.

      I know the member for Dauphin talked about harvest–spring and the harvest when you bring in extra help. I know that and–especially on some of the larger farms, I'm thinking of the potato operations where they have large crews come in for the fall. They do robust safety training for those employees because nobody wants to see an accident happen, so they're–they've been very robust on doing training.

      Livestock industry, which I am very familiar with, I think back to the days of some of the really primitive handling equip­ment and the dangers that were out there. The handling equip­ment for cattle, in parti­cular, is much better now and much safer for the owners of the livestock and for those employees that are working with them. But it still needs–there is much more work to be done on there.

      The member from Dauphin also mentioned personal pro­tec­tive equip­ment, PPEs, as they're known, the high visibility vests; you see them being worn by farm workers now, the ear, eye protection. The dust pro­tec­tion that's available now is certainly advanced from years ago, and it's being used. And, as I mentioned, the safety training that takes place on farms, and there's organi­zations that are certainly–been very robust in doing training: the Uni­ver­sity of Manitoba and the ag diploma and ag degree programs, Assiniboine College and their ag program, Canadian Agri­cul­tural Safety Association, SAFE Work Manitoba, keystone agri­cul­ture producers has a farm safety program going.

I know the member from Dauphin mentioned Manitoba Hydro. On our own farm, we buried a lot of the hydro lines, which saves you from an overhead ex­per­ience, parti­cularly the bigger equip­ment now. But there's still a danger there that people need to be aware of, that you don't disturb those lines when you're doing ground work around your yard.

      And, certainly, the mental health, as all industry has become–as the general popu­la­tion has become more aware of mental health issues, this is also on the farm safety. It is paramount that we recog­nize that there are mental health issues within the farm com­mu­nity, and there are organi­zations that are certainly helping to deal and help people cope with mental health issues. And it can be a very personal thing. And there is a recog­nition now that there should–there's no shame in going forward asking for help if you do have mental health challenges.

      And I think back to many years ago, a person who died who had mental health challenges, and back then there just was not the recog­nition, the places where he could have gone for help. And I think of Jim quite often now, Mr. Deputy Speaker. And today, there was–you know, we could've possibly prevented that death from happening. And so that certainly needs to happen. So, there–with–just a recog­nition, general recog­nition, that safety is everybody's responsibility, whether you're a farm owner, farm family, employees on a farm, it is certainly much more forefront now than in previous years where it was just kind of taken for granted and not really accentuated that we need to.

      So, certainly thank all our farm families out there for the work they do, for the food they produce. We wish them–for the grain producers, we wish them a suc­cess­ful season this year. There's some puddles out on the farms, on the land right now that we haven't seen for a couple of years, so we hope that we have some adequate moisture. And for our livestock producers, it will certainly help to bring back some of the forages that have really suffered in the last three years.

      And so, with that Mr. Deputy Speaker, we wish all our farm families and farm owners the very best in the coming season here, and safety is–should always be paramount for everyone. Thank you.

Mr. Adrien Sala (St. James): Really pleased to have an op­por­tun­ity today to speak to this reso­lu­tion from the member from Dauphin. We know, of course, that agri­cul­ture is one of the most dangerous industries in Canada, and for that reason, this is an im­por­tant week to celebrate, and to celebrate, of course, the work of producers in helping to make farming a safer activity and, ultimately, to make farms not only safer places to work but also safer places to be and to live.

      And, you know, this week is also a good op­por­tun­ity to celebrate producers in Manitoba, to celebrate local food production, to celebrate the in­cred­ibly im­por­tant role that they've played in the history of this province and the dev­elop­ment of this province and to thank them for their im­por­tant work.

* (11:40)

      So it is good to see this gov­ern­ment attempting to celebrate producers here with this reso­lu­tion. But it is really im­por­tant to point out that this reso­lu­tion is not a re­place­ment for provi­ding real supports to farmers in Manitoba. In fact, you know, we've seen this gov­ern­ment fail so badly to provide the supports needed to farmers, that if this goes on for many years, we won't have a lot of farmers to celebrate in upcoming agri­cul­ture safety weeks in this province.

      You know, if we look to the decisions we've seen from this gov­ern­ment, what seems to be clear is that they've been in­ten­tionally moving away from ensuring we have the proper support for smaller producers, for family farms, and moving towards privileging larger producers, cor­por­ate producers, and big money, and the role of big money in agri­cul­ture in Manitoba–and I think the biggest example of this is one that my colleague spoke to, which is the changes that this gov­ern­ment has brought in to Crown lands regula­tions.

      You know, I think this is–the changes that were made here are in­cred­ibly egregious and, really, I think it is im­por­tant that we do what we can to raise more attention to the changes that this gov­ern­ment brought in. Because the changes that they brought in have only served to increase the challenges being faced by small producers in this province, and, in fact, the changes promise to steal away the futures for a lot of family-run farms in this province, or families that run those farms. And that's a huge concern.

      And, of course, my colleague, the critic for Agricul­ture, has done in­cred­ible work in connecting with a lot of these producers and learning from these families and hearing their stories, and those stories are con­cern­ing. And, you know, we've heard some–I think–some nice words from members of this Chamber that actually have ex­per­ience, that are farmers them­selves, or have a back­ground in farming, and it is good to know that we have that repre­sen­tation here in the Chamber.

      But I really would ask them about, you know, their genuine thoughts on the changes that have been brought in by this gov­ern­ment, relative to Crown lands. I really would like to know their honest opinion about what their gov­ern­ment has done to the future of these family-run farms.

      You know, the changes that were made to the Crown lands leasing system, the changes to the point system that had been used for a gen­era­tion, that helped to ensure small producers and family-run farms could continue to do their work, could continue to have those farms be owned and operated by families, by Manitoban families, has been modified in a way that privileges big money, that does nothing to support those family-run farms.

      And those changes will massively increase the cost of doing busi­ness for those farmers. We know–we've heard from farmers who've seen 300 per cent increases in the cost of their lease–300 per cent, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Think about the impact on that if you're a small-busi­ness owner, what that would mean for you as somebody who's trying to do busi­ness. How can you possibly continue to sustain your operation as a small operator, barely–possibly facing a whole range of other headwinds and challenges in our current environ­ment, whether they be drought or other challenges, and you're seeing a 300 per cent increase in the cost of your lease?

      I really ask, again, the member for Dauphin (Mr. Michaleski), who's brought forward what I think here is an im­por­tant reso­lu­tion, how does that impact friends, family members that you know farming in the Dauphin area? And I know that we're talking about ranching, that Dauphin is sort of near the epicentre of where a lot of our ranching happens, and those–that region of the province. How are they responding to that?

      You know, not only does it massively increase their cost of doing busi­ness–which I think all of us here can agree, if you're a small-busi­ness owner, would create sig­ni­fi­cant challenges–it's placing them in competition with out-of-province money, with big money that can now come in here and kick them off the farm in exchange for these bigger cor­por­ate operations.

      And I think the most con­cern­ing change, by far–and, again, I really wonder what it's like–and I mean this in a non-partisan way–I really wonder what it's like when the members from this Chamber who are from farming com­mu­nities go back to their home com­mu­nities and they're forced to face farmers who are facing down, or who–or sorry, who have faced down the–this change to this Crown lands regula­tion that no longer allows unit transfers. The loss of the ability to transfer their Crown land assets, those leases, when they, perhaps, choose to sell to their children to continue that family tradition is the equivalent of stealing away their pension. It's the equivalent of robbing them from their–of their futures.

      All of these farmers, producers in those regions that may have invested for years, invested untold thousands of dollars, hundreds of thousands of dollars, perhaps, in capital upgrades to the Crown lands that would have been adjacent to their farms. They've made these huge invest­ments, and now all of those invest­ments are no longer worth anything.

      How do we honestly respond to that? How can we stand behind that?

      We're robbing them of that future. Because, if they can't sell, if they can't benefit from the unit transfer of knowing that when they go to sell their ranch to their child, that their–that family member is guaranteed to have access to that Crown land adjacent to their farm that allowed them to do the work that they were doing, the value of their ranch is effectively wiped out.

An Honourable Member: Well, obviously, you don't understand.

Mr. Sala: Well, I ap­pre­ciate that the member from Midland is chirping here, and has raised his voice and is suggesting that I obviously don't understand what's happening here. But I would invite him to stand up and to explain to this House how the elimination of unit transfers is benefitting family farmers in Manitoba. I invite him to explain to this House where I'm getting this wrong. He can't do it. He can't do it.

      Again, this gov­ern­ment is stealing away the future of family farms in this province. They've stolen it away by eliminating unit transfers. So they can deny it, can, you know, make comments in this House, but, again, I would invite him to stand up and explain not only to this House, but to explain to the hundreds of producers who have organized against the changes that this gov­ern­ment brought in.

      They don't have to take my word for it, they can look to the 500-person meetings that have been organized in the com­mu­nities that they represent. They can listen to the farmers who've reached out to say, you know, the changes that you've brought in are stealing away our future. [interjection]

      So, again, the–I want to put on the record that the member for Midland (Mr. Pedersen) is laughing, and I think producers in this province would love to know that the member for Midland is laughing at commentary that's being made about what his gov­ern­ment's done to take away unit transfers. He's laughing and suggesting that, ultimately, the infor­ma­tion here–I'm guessing that he's suggesting the infor­ma­tion I'm putting on the record is false. But again, I invite him to refute it.

      It doesn't matter how many times he says it's false, it's not going to make it true; this is simply fact. The gov­ern­ment stole away unit transfers. They've stolen away the first right of refusal for farmers to ensure that they can access those leases and they've massively increased the costs of doing busi­ness.

      So we can stand here in this Chamber–and, again, I do ap­pre­ciate what has been brought forward. I think this reso­lu­tion is important. It is im­por­tant to celebrate, you know, the need to improve safety within our agri­cul­tural sector in Manitoba. It's im­por­tant to celebrate our farmers and their con­tri­bu­tions to making farming safer in this province. But that does nothing, this does nothing to make up for what this gov­ern­ment has done or what they've failed to do to support farmers in this province.

      So they are going to be held accountable for these failures, and I–again, I've heard commentary from members opposite here. I want to hear them stand up today and actually respond to the substance of what's been put on the record.

      We need to do way more to support our farmers in this province. We need to stop the cuts and we need to make sure that family farms can continue to succeed in Manitoba.

      Thank you very much, Mr. Deputy Speaker.

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): Mr. Deputy Speaker, I want to begin my comments on farm safety week by–with a big thank you to the keystone agri­cul­ture producers for their efforts over many years to improve farm safety. The KAP organi­zation is to be complimented for these efforts and to be applauded for making an im­por­tant con­tri­bu­tion to the safety of farmers through­out Manitoba.

* (11:50)

      The MLA, in his reso­lu­tion–the MLA for Dauphin says that agri­cul­ture is one of the most dangerous industries in Canada. It doesn't necessarily have to be this way. In fact, it is improving and, yet, the MLA for Dauphin also comments that in his area the proportion of farms with a farm safety plan is low.

      Indeed, I've heard from another source that the proportion of farms with a farm safety plan may be as low as 5 per cent. There clearly is sig­ni­fi­cant room for im­prove­ment in this area, perhaps, im­prove­ment in the way that farm safety plans are done as well as in the im­prove­ment in enlisting more farmers to develop and use farm safety plans.

      At the MLA for Dauphin, when asked, what is a common example of a safety issue, talked about the problem of farmers using equip­ment in a way that pulls hydro lines down. Surely, a good item to put in a farm safety plan is the location of hydro lines or planning to put them underground, as the MLA for Midland has talked about, so that the problem of dangerous hydro lines and interaction with hydro lines in a way that can be dangerous, can be diminished and the dangers associated with this can be eliminated.

      The good news, Mr. Deputy Speaker, is that the time-lost-to-injury rate has come down significantly from 2011 to 2020. This is likely, in part, from im­prove­ments in machinery, equip­ment, which is becoming safer and safer in a variety of aspects, including reducing problems with hearing loss as many of the current cabs are much quieter.

      But time lost to injury, I believe, includes only farm workers, not owners or farm families. Owners are also curiously exempt from following some of the safety approaches which are mandatory for workers. And owners, including anyone in the farm family, on a family farm are–I would guess–not included in the time-lost-to-injury statistics. So there is room for better im­prove­ment in the way we gather infor­ma­tion on farm safety, and farm injuries and time lost to work. And I hope that the Keystone Agri­cul­tural Producers will continue to work and looking for im­prove­ments in these areas.

      I had hoped that the MLA for Dauphin would have given more details on the most common farm accidents and measures to prevent such accidents. This sort of infor­ma­tion is very im­por­tant if we're going to make progress, day by day and year by year, in reducing accidents and in reducing injuries. Hopefully, the MLA for Dauphin will provide this infor­ma­tion at another time, and give us this infor­ma­tion on another occasion.

      I want to say, Mr. Deputy Speaker, that Manitoba Liberals are fully sup­port­ive of the efforts to improve farm safety and this reso­lu­tion and believe that im­prove­ments in farm safety based on evidence and on common sense will be needed and im­por­tant as we make progress in reducing farm injuries and farm accidents.

      And, lastly, Mr. Deputy Speaker, I want to make a comment on the situation with regard to Crown lands, which has been brought up. Manitoba Liberals have met with many who have been very badly affected by the Pallister-Stefanson gov­ern­ments' changes to the management of farm–of Crown lands. We continue to believe that the approach taken was detrimental to many farmers and, indeed, to com­mu­nities, because we need to be supporting not just farmers, but the whole com­mu­nities.

      And, also, that the approach taken may be quite detrimental not only in that it increased costs to farmers, but it increased uncertainties, and one is not often optimum in terms of long-run stewardship of the Crown lands in the way that the unit transfers was taken away, and those who take over Crown lands may be more likely to be focused on short-term gains and long-term gains. It is some­thing that will remain to be seen as things evolve, but it is–remains to be a concern.

      So with this–those comments, I thank members for this op­por­tun­ity to talk about a very im­por­tant issue, which is farm safety, and I hope we can move together with farmers and Keystone Agri­cul­tural Producers in this effort to reduce injuries and make farms places which are safer.

      Thank you.

Mr. Ralph Eichler (Lakeside): Certainly, I want to thank the member from Dauphin for bringing this reso­lu­tion forward.

      As we know, last week we celebrated farm safety week, and one that's really critically im­por­tant.

      I do want to just say and make–shout-out also to the Keystone Ag Producers. I know when I was a minister, we took it very seriously and we've funded them to the amount of $350,000 each and every year to talk about farm safety.

      Also, the dealerships that put on training for other people and fertilizer companies and others that–is paramount that we learn about safety, whether it be livestock safety, whether it be machine safety and making sure that the animals have safety as well.

      So I want to, again, just say–to thank you to the member for Dauphin (Mr. Michaleski) for bringing it forward and we'll call on the vote.

      So, thank you, Acting Deputy Speaker.

Mr. Deputy Speaker: Is the House ready for the question?

      Are there any other members who would like to speak?

Some Honourable Members: Question.

Mr. Deputy Speaker: Is the House ready for the question?

Some Honourable Members: Question.

Mr. Deputy Speaker: The question before the House is the reso­lu­tion put forward by the hon­our­able member for Dauphin. Is it the will of the–

      THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba expresses its gratitude to the people of Manitoba and agricultural producers for their role in making this year's Agricultural Safety Week a success.

      Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? [Agreed]

      The hour being 12 noon, this House is adjourned–[interjection]–recessed.

      The hour being 12 noon, this House is recessed and stands recessed until 1:30 p.m. this afternoon.


 


LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF MANITOBA

Tuesday, March 22, 2022

CONTENTS


Vol. 27a

ORDERS OF THE DAY

PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS

Debate on Second Readings– Public Bills

Bill 205–The Filipino Heritage Month Act

Wiebe  905

Cox  906

Sandhu  906

Guenter 907

Bushie  908

Fontaine  910

Wasyliw   911

Marcelino  912

Resolutions

Res. 7–Recognizing a Successful Agriculture Safety Week

Michaleski 914

Questions

Brar 916

Michaleski 917

Gerrard  917

Pedersen  917

Eichler 917

Wishart 918

Debate

Brar 918

Pedersen  920

Sala  921

Gerrard  923

Eichler 924